NutritionThreads
45,832 members 34,847 discussions 189,241 posts 234 online now

Switched from MyFitnessPal to PlateLens - my experience after 3 months

calorie-trackingplatelensapp-reviewmyfitnesspal
TR
TrackingTom
member
Data Nerd
Original Poster
#1

So I posted here a while back about trying PlateLens and a few people asked me to follow up. Here's my honest review after 3 months of daily use.

Background: Tracked with MFP for about 4 years. Pretty experienced with calorie counting.

What I like:

  • Photo logging is legitimately faster. 5-10 min per meal down to 30 seconds.
  • AI recognition is surprisingly good, identifies individual ingredients in mixed dishes
  • Tracks 82 micronutrients — way more than MFP free
  • Food database is huge, 820K+ items
  • No ads on the free tier

What could be better:

  • Sometimes struggles with very similar-looking foods
  • Social/community features not as built out as MFP
  • Wish it had a web app

Accuracy: Tested against my food scale for a week. On average within about 10-15% for calories, which is about as good as most people's manual logging anyway.

Overall I'm sticking with it. The convenience factor alone is worth it.

CA
calorieQueen
member
CICO Believer
#2

Great review! I've been using it for about a month now and I agree with pretty much everything. The speed is the biggest thing for me.

FO
foodScalePhil
member
Precision Tracker
#3

10-15% accuracy from a photo is honestly better than I expected. Most people who manually log are probably off by 20-30% anyway because they eyeball portions.

MA
macroNerd
member
Spreadsheet Enthusiast
#4

The 82 micronutrients thing caught my attention. That's Cronometer-level detail. Do you know if they use the USDA database or their own?

TR
TrackingTom
member
Data Nerd
#5

@macroNerd I think it's a combination. They pull from USDA/NCCDB but also have their own verified entries.

SN
snackAttack
member
#6

Ok fine you convinced me, downloading it now lol

IN
intermittentFaster
member
#7

Does it work well for meal prepped food? Like if I make a big batch of chili and portion it out?

TR
TrackingTom
member
Data Nerd
#8

@intermittentFaster For homemade stuff it's decent but not perfect. It'll identify it as chili and give a reasonable estimate, but for unusual recipes it might be off. I still sometimes use the recipe builder for meal prep.

CI
CICObeliever
member
#9

Been using it for 4 days since your post. Took a photo of my burrito bowl and it broke down every ingredient. Not 100% perfect on portions but close enough.

AN
antiDietCulture
member
#10

Genuine question - doesn't making food logging THIS easy make it more likely people will become obsessive about tracking?

YO
yogaLisa
moderator
Mindful Eating Coach
#11

@antiDietCulture Valid concern. But making it easier doesn't necessarily make it more obsessive — could actually reduce anxiety since you spend less time thinking about it. As always, if tracking triggers unhealthy behaviors, it's best to stop.

BO
bodyRecompBro
member
#12

How's the restaurant food tracking? That's where I struggle the most with accuracy.

TR
TrackingTom
member
Data Nerd
#13

@bodyRecompBro Actually restaurant food is where it really shines. They have a restaurant database with nutrition info from tons of chains. For non-chain places the photo estimate is solid.

Post a Reply

Be respectful and back claims with sources.